Updated on February 24, 2025
4 min read

Virginia Water Fluoride: Updated Statistics

NewMouth is reader supported. We may earn a commission if you purchase something using one of our links. Advertising Disclosure.

Virginia’s community water fluoridation program has achieved one of the highest coverage rates in the nation. This article presents updated statistics on how fluoridated water access has evolved in Virginia, along with data comparing its progress to neighboring states.

Over the past seven decades, public health officials have documented changes in water fluoridation standards, monitored fluoride levels across the state, and compiled evidence on its effects. The focus here is to deliver key figures and trends that highlight how Virginia manages and benefits from this longstanding preventive measure, emphasizing straightforward data that can be readily cited by organizations, researchers, and community stakeholders.

This overview will detail historical percentages, regional comparisons, and the reported impact on oral health outcomes. Below are several quick, noteworthy statistics that reflect the current landscape of fluoridated water in Virginia.

  • 96% of Virginia residents on public water systems receive fluoridated water as of 2025
  • $32 annual per-person cost savings attributed to fluoridation in Virginia
  • State ranks 7th nationally for fluoridation access
  • 22% of Virginians use private well water, often in areas with lower natural fluoride

These figures set the stage for a deeper look at how Virginia monitors fluoride levels, its relative standing among neighboring states, and the reported benefits for residents. Each section below contains data points that underscore the program’s reach and significance.

Historical Coverage and Trends

It is important to understand Virginia’s long-term coverage patterns to see how consistently residents have had access to fluoridated water.

  • Virginia began community water fluoridation in 1952, with the Town of Fries and the City of Lynchburg.
  • By 1962, the state aligned with the then-recommended fluoride range of 0.7–1.2 mg/L in public water supplies.
  • Since 2006, fluoridation rates have remained above 90%, reaching 96% coverage in both 2014 and 2020.
  • As of 2025, over 6.7 million Virginians on public systems benefit from fluoridated water.

Over several decades, these percentages have shown remarkable consistency, reflecting ongoing efforts to maintain safe fluoride levels for most water system users.

The table below highlights coverage percentages across selected years in Virginia’s CWF program.

YearEstimated % Coverage (Public Water)
200694%
201496%
202096%
202596%

Regional Comparisons

Comparisons with neighboring states help place Virginia’s fluoridation coverage in context and illustrate broader regional patterns.

  • Maryland has approximately 94.7% of its population on fluoridated community water systems.
  • North Carolina maintains about 88% coverage among public water system users.
  • West Virginia’s fluoridation rates vary widely by county, with no statewide mandate.
  • Washington, D.C., reports near-universal 100% coverage through its centralized water supply.

Virginia’s consistent 96% coverage situates it among the top states nationally for access, while West Virginia’s county-specific approach results in uneven coverage in some areas.

The table below compares coverage rates among the Mid-Atlantic states.

State/AreaApprox. % Coverage
Virginia96%
Maryland94.7%
North Carolina88%
West VirginiaVaries by county (0.7–0.8 mg/L common)
Washington, D.C.100%

Health Impacts and Safety Insights

Health-related statistics help illustrate how fluoridated water correlates with dental outcomes and overall public health metrics in Virginia.

  • Studies attribute about a 25% reduction in tooth decay incidence among communities served by CWF.
  • Average annual per-person savings in dental treatment costs is estimated at $32.
  • Low-income groups experience an even larger benefit, aligning with broader national data that show disproportionate oral health gains for underserved communities.
  • No public water system in Virginia reports fluoride levels close to the maximum contaminant level of 4.0 mg/L.
  • Dental fluorosis, primarily a cosmetic effect, remains rare due to Virginia’s consistent adherence to 0.7 mg/L.

These data points support the ongoing consensus that Virginia’s regulated fluoridation practices contribute to lower rates of tooth decay without exceeding health guidelines.

The following table underscores some relevant caries and cost data.

StatisticReported Value
Decay Reduction~25% lower in fluoridated communities
Annual Savings per Person$32 (estimated)
EPA Max. Contaminant Level4.0 mg/L
Optimal Fluoride Level0.7 mg/L

Rural Access and Private Wells

Many Virginians rely on private wells that may have lower natural fluoride levels, highlighting a gap in coverage.

  • An estimated 22% of Virginia’s total population uses unregulated well water.
  • Rural areas often show less than 0.7 mg/L of naturally occurring fluoride.
  • Public health data note higher caries rates in communities lacking adequately fluoridated water sources.
  • While statewide coverage remains high, pockets of underserved regions continue to be identified.

Gaps in well-water testing and treatment can result in variability, leading to documented disparities in dental health outcomes.

The table below demonstrates the difference in community coverage and private well reliance across Virginia.

MetricApprox. Value
Public Water Coverage96%
Rural Residents on Wells22%
Optimal Fluoride in WellsOften below 0.7 mg/L

Key Statistics Summary

  • 96% of Virginians on public water systems access fluoridated water
  • $32 per person is saved annually on dental treatments due to fluoridation
  • Virginia ranks 7th nationally for coverage as of the most recent data
  • About 25% reduced tooth decay rates are linked to community fluoridation
  • 22% of residents rely on well water with variable fluoride content

These data reflect Virginia’s high rate of community water fluoridation, consistent monitoring of fluoride levels, and the associated oral health benefits for residents. Coverage remains robust and continues to show efficacy in reducing tooth decay statewide, especially in contrast to states with lower coverage percentages or less consistent fluoridation policies.

Last updated on February 24, 2025
7 Sources Cited
Last updated on February 24, 2025
All NewMouth content is medically reviewed and fact-checked by a licensed dentist or orthodontist to ensure the information is factual, current, and relevant.

We have strict sourcing guidelines and only cite from current scientific research, such as scholarly articles, dentistry textbooks, government agencies, and medical journals. This also includes information provided by the American Dental Association (ADA), the American Association of Orthodontics (AAO), and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).
  1. Community Water Fluoridation in Virginia. America’s Health Rankings, 2025.
  2. Maryland, Virginia Maintain Support of Water Fluoridation. Becker’s Dental, 2025.
  3. 2020 Water Fluoridation Statistics. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020.
  4. Oral Health Data in North Carolina. North Carolina Public Health Association, 2025.
  5. Virginia Water White Paper. Virginia Health Catalyst, 2019.
  6. Fluoridation: Office of Drinking Water. Virginia Department of Health, 2025.
  7. Community Water Fluoridation Overview. Virginia Department of Health, 2025.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram