In this article
Virginia’s community water fluoridation program has achieved one of the highest coverage rates in the nation. This article presents updated statistics on how fluoridated water access has evolved in Virginia, along with data comparing its progress to neighboring states.
Over the past seven decades, public health officials have documented changes in water fluoridation standards, monitored fluoride levels across the state, and compiled evidence on its effects. The focus here is to deliver key figures and trends that highlight how Virginia manages and benefits from this longstanding preventive measure, emphasizing straightforward data that can be readily cited by organizations, researchers, and community stakeholders.
This overview will detail historical percentages, regional comparisons, and the reported impact on oral health outcomes. Below are several quick, noteworthy statistics that reflect the current landscape of fluoridated water in Virginia.
These figures set the stage for a deeper look at how Virginia monitors fluoride levels, its relative standing among neighboring states, and the reported benefits for residents. Each section below contains data points that underscore the program’s reach and significance.
It is important to understand Virginia’s long-term coverage patterns to see how consistently residents have had access to fluoridated water.
Over several decades, these percentages have shown remarkable consistency, reflecting ongoing efforts to maintain safe fluoride levels for most water system users.
The table below highlights coverage percentages across selected years in Virginia’s CWF program.
Year | Estimated % Coverage (Public Water) |
---|---|
2006 | 94% |
2014 | 96% |
2020 | 96% |
2025 | 96% |
Comparisons with neighboring states help place Virginia’s fluoridation coverage in context and illustrate broader regional patterns.
Virginia’s consistent 96% coverage situates it among the top states nationally for access, while West Virginia’s county-specific approach results in uneven coverage in some areas.
The table below compares coverage rates among the Mid-Atlantic states.
State/Area | Approx. % Coverage |
---|---|
Virginia | 96% |
Maryland | 94.7% |
North Carolina | 88% |
West Virginia | Varies by county (0.7–0.8 mg/L common) |
Washington, D.C. | 100% |
Health-related statistics help illustrate how fluoridated water correlates with dental outcomes and overall public health metrics in Virginia.
These data points support the ongoing consensus that Virginia’s regulated fluoridation practices contribute to lower rates of tooth decay without exceeding health guidelines.
The following table underscores some relevant caries and cost data.
Statistic | Reported Value |
---|---|
Decay Reduction | ~25% lower in fluoridated communities |
Annual Savings per Person | $32 (estimated) |
EPA Max. Contaminant Level | 4.0 mg/L |
Optimal Fluoride Level | 0.7 mg/L |
Many Virginians rely on private wells that may have lower natural fluoride levels, highlighting a gap in coverage.
Gaps in well-water testing and treatment can result in variability, leading to documented disparities in dental health outcomes.
The table below demonstrates the difference in community coverage and private well reliance across Virginia.
Metric | Approx. Value |
---|---|
Public Water Coverage | 96% |
Rural Residents on Wells | 22% |
Optimal Fluoride in Wells | Often below 0.7 mg/L |
These data reflect Virginia’s high rate of community water fluoridation, consistent monitoring of fluoride levels, and the associated oral health benefits for residents. Coverage remains robust and continues to show efficacy in reducing tooth decay statewide, especially in contrast to states with lower coverage percentages or less consistent fluoridation policies.
In this article