Updated on February 24, 2025
4 min read

New York Water Fluoride: Updated Statistics

NewMouth is reader supported. We may earn a commission if you purchase something using one of our links. Advertising Disclosure.

New York’s water fluoridation efforts have undergone notable shifts over the past two decades, reflecting diverse practices and demographic differences across the state. Although public water fluoridation has traditionally been a key preventive health measure, coverage has trended downward in some regions while stabilizing or expanding in others.

In examining these statistics, we see that coverage rates, infrastructure demands, and socioeconomic factors intersect to shape oral health outcomes. The data below provide a detailed look at how these elements evolve county by county and across different segments of the population.

Key Figures at a Glance

Here are four important data points that highlight the recent trends and disparities in New York’s water fluoridation coverage:

  • 71.4% statewide fluoridation coverage in 2012, down from 75% in 2000
  • 100% coverage in New York City, sustained since the 1960s
  • 0% fluoridation rate on Long Island, despite dense population
  • 19% rise in pediatric caries claims during Buffalo’s fluoridation gap (2015–2023)

These key statistics offer a glimpse into varying local policies and illustrate how differences in coverage contribute to disparities in oral health outcomes. Further data help clarify these trends across time and regions.

Statewide Coverage Trends

Understanding New York’s changing coverage rates over time underscores the wide-ranging impact on oral health services and preventive care usage.

  • The number of community water systems fluoridating dropped from 139 in 2009 to 125 in 2012
  • Overall coverage stabilized at around 71% by 2020, placing New York 31st among U.S. states
  • Statewide coverage in 2005 was higher than in 2012, reflecting a gradual decline over the period
  • Fluoridation rates have historically been strong in urban centers but uneven in rural and suburban areas

Although the decline has slowed in recent years, these figures emphasize the need to assess how coverage variations correlate with health outcomes and cost implications. Below is a simplified view of overall fluoridation changes by select time points.

YearStatewide % CoverageNumber of Fluoridating Systems
2005~75%Not Recorded
2009~73%139
201271.4%125
202071%Not Recorded

Regional Disparities

Coverage rates vary considerably across New York, highlighting local policy decisions and infrastructure considerations that lead to different outcomes.

  • 100% coverage in New York City ensures universal availability for over 8 million residents
  • 89.8% coverage in Western New York counties, reflecting high rates in urban centers offset by gaps in rural water systems
  • Only 39.5% coverage in the Capital Region, influenced by historic resistance in Albany and Schenectady
  • 0% fluoridation in Nassau and Suffolk counties on Long Island, affecting a large suburban population

These localized differences relate directly to observed oral health outcomes and costs. The table below gives a snapshot of 2025 fluoridation rates by major region.

RegionFluoridation RateKey Characteristics
New York City100%Universal coverage since 1966
Western NY89.8%High coverage in Erie/Niagara, rural gaps
Capital Region39.5%Historic resistance in Albany/Schenectady
Hudson Valley49.4%Contrast between 88.7% in Westchester and 0% in Rockland/Putnam
Long Island0%Significant suburban population without fluoridation

Oral Health Impacts

The connection between water fluoridation and caries prevention is well-documented, with data illustrating how differing coverage rates shape oral health burdens and healthcare costs.

  • A 19% rise in pediatric caries procedures in Buffalo during its 2015–2023 fluoridation gap
  • 33% more restorative procedures among Medicaid enrollees in low-fluoridation counties
  • $23.65 higher per-capita treatment costs in non-fluoridated regions
  • 27% lower caries incidence in fluoridated Newburgh compared to non-fluoridated Kingston, narrowing to a 16% gap in 2024

These findings underscore the significance of consistent fluoridation for long-term cost reduction and caries prevention across various population groups. The table below highlights select oral health indicators in key counties.

LocationFluoridation CoverageCaries Rate (Children)ER Visits (Caries, Annual)
Buffalo (2015-2023)SuspendedIncreased by 19%Up to 255,000 impacted
NewburghFluoridated27% lower than KingstonLower rates of pediatric ER use
AlbanyNon-fluoridated until 2024N/A342 pediatric visits annually
TroyFluoridatedN/A~1/3 of Albany’s ER visits

Comparisons and Infrastructure Factors

Comparative data across neighboring states and within New York reveal how policy history and aging water systems contribute to the variability in fluoridation coverage.

  • Massachusetts (92.1%) and Connecticut (88.4%) far exceed New York’s ~71% coverage
  • Statewide 5th-grade caries rate in New York stands at 34%, above 28% in Connecticut and 26% in Massachusetts
  • Only 61% of New York children receive dental sealants, compared to 69% in New England
  • Up to 43% of upstate water systems require major upgrades, costing an estimated $2.1 billion

Infrastructure improvements and the presence or absence of fluoridation technology continue to shape public health outcomes, with upgrades in major cities like New York City temporarily affecting coverage levels. The table below provides a brief comparison with nearby states.

State% CoverageChildren’s Caries RateMedicaid Dental ($/Child)
New York~71%34%$189
Massachusetts92.1%26%Data Not Provided
Connecticut88.4%28%Data Not Provided
Pennsylvania76.3%Data Not Provided$162
New Jersey81.9%Data Not Provided$155

Key Statistics Summary

  • Coverage dropped from 75% (2000) to 71.4% (2012), stabilizing near 71% by 2020
  • Long Island remains at 0% fluoridation despite a large suburban population
  • Children in low-fluoridation counties face 33% more restorative procedures
  • New York ranks 31st in the nation for community water fluoridation rates
  • Massachusetts and Connecticut both exceed 88% coverage, contrasting with New York’s lower rate

These data underscore how infrastructure constraints, local policies, and regional variations contribute to divergent oral health outcomes statewide. Despite universal coverage in New York City, other regions continue to grapple with reduced access to fluoridated water and its associated benefits.

Last updated on February 24, 2025
21 Sources Cited
Last updated on February 24, 2025
All NewMouth content is medically reviewed and fact-checked by a licensed dentist or orthodontist to ensure the information is factual, current, and relevant.

We have strict sourcing guidelines and only cite from current scientific research, such as scholarly articles, dentistry textbooks, government agencies, and medical journals. This also includes information provided by the American Dental Association (ADA), the American Association of Orthodontics (AAO), and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).
  1. Capital of New York State Poised to Welcome Fluoridated Water. American Dental Association, 2023.
  2. Buffalo Expected to Restart Water Fluoridation. American Dental Association, 2024.
  3. Response to Anti-Fluoridation Claims. American Fluoridation Society, 2017.
  4. PMCID: PMC10706776. National Center for Biotechnology Information, Year Unknown.
  5. 2020 Water Fluoridation Statistics. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020.
  6. 2022 Water Fluoridation Statistics. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022.
  7. Fluoride Indicators in New York. New York State Department of Health, 2013.
  8. Fluoridation Letter May 2015. New York State Department of Health, 2015.
  9. Fluoride and Oral Health. New York State Department of Health, Year Unknown.
  10. Fluoride Guidance During Infancy. New York State Department of Health, Year Unknown.
  11. Impact of Oral Disease in New York State. New York State Department of Health, Year Unknown.
  12. 2018 Drinking Water Supply Quality Report. New York City Department of Environmental Protection, 2018.
  13. 2019 Drinking Water Supply Quality Report. New York City Department of Environmental Protection, 2019.
  14. 2020 Drinking Water Supply Quality Report. New York City Department of Environmental Protection, 2020.
  15. 2021 Drinking Water Supply Quality Report. New York City Department of Environmental Protection, 2021.
  16. 2023 Drinking Water Supply Quality Report. New York City Department of Environmental Protection, 2023.
  17. My Water's Fluoride Database. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Year Unknown.
  18. Fluoride Finally Coming to Albany Water Supply. Times Union, Year Unknown.
  19. Albany Common Council Greenlights Water Fluoridation. WAMC, 2024.
  20. Fluoride in NYC Water. The New York Times, 2024.
  21. Fluoride, Water, and Health. The New York Times, 2024.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram