In this article
Connecticut’s approach to water fluoridation is often held up as an example of consistent practice in promoting oral health. This article examines the latest available statistical data on fluoridated water coverage, dental health indicators, and comparisons with neighboring states.
While many states show fluctuations in fluoridation levels, Connecticut’s numbers remain notably stable. This stability is reflected in high coverage rates and tangible impacts on dental health outcomes across diverse communities. Below is a comprehensive overview of key statistics and data points that illustrate Connecticut’s standing in water fluoridation.
Highlighted below are several noteworthy points showcasing the scale and scope of Connecticut’s water fluoridation efforts.
These initial figures offer a clear picture of Connecticut’s extensive coverage and the potential link to improved oral health indicators. The sections below provide deeper analysis of each aspect.
Examining statewide water fluoridation coverage over multiple years provides insight into ongoing trends and changes in the population receiving fluoridated water.
Despite small year-to-year variations, these figures show long-term stability. The table below presents select data points illustrating Connecticut’s coverage percentages.
Year | Fluoridation Coverage | Approximate Population Served |
---|---|---|
2006 | 88.0% | 2.2 million |
2011 | 88.0% | 2.3 million |
2018 | 89.5% | 2.3 million |
2024 | 86.0% | 2.4 million |
Tracking statistics on tooth decay rates, dental fluorosis prevalence, and cost savings offers insights into the broader impact of water fluoridation on public health.
In addition to clinical measures of dental health, economic data underscores the potential budgetary advantages of widespread fluoridation. Below is a table illustrating selected outcomes connected with fluoridation in Connecticut.
Indicator | Fluoridated Regions | Less-Fluoridated Regions |
---|---|---|
Medicaid Restorative Claims | 33.4% fewer | Higher claim volume |
Average Annual Per Capita Dental Cost | $30 less | Baseline or higher |
Mild Fluorosis Rate (Adults 40–49) | 8.7% | 20.8% (national) |
Untreated Dental Decay (Children) | 25% below US avg. | National baseline |
Looking at Connecticut alongside neighboring states reveals considerable variation in fluoridation coverage across the region, highlighting differences in legislation and infrastructure.
These cross-state comparisons emphasize the role of state-level regulations and priorities. Below is a table summarizing selected metrics from several Northeastern states.
State | Fluoridation Coverage | Pediatric Caries Rate |
---|---|---|
Connecticut | 86–89% | ~28% |
Massachusetts | 75.6% | N/A |
New York | 62.9% (Statewide) | N/A |
Rhode Island | 84.2% | N/A |
New Jersey | 14.5% | ~37% |
Although Connecticut’s coverage is notably high, certain parts of the population may have different levels of fluoride exposure based on geography and water sources.
These points illustrate the broader challenge of ensuring uniform fluoridation while balancing naturally high-fluoride water sources with established standards.
The above data indicates Connecticut has maintained one of the most comprehensive water fluoridation programs in the country. High coverage rates, documented health improvements, and notable cost savings underscore the practical effects of sustained fluoridation efforts. These statistics help illustrate both the current landscape and the value Connecticut’s residents derive from ongoing access to fluoridated water.
In this article