Updated on February 24, 2025
4 min read

Connecticut Water Fluoride: Updated Statistics

NewMouth is reader supported. We may earn a commission if you purchase something using one of our links. Advertising Disclosure.

Connecticut’s approach to water fluoridation is often held up as an example of consistent practice in promoting oral health. This article examines the latest available statistical data on fluoridated water coverage, dental health indicators, and comparisons with neighboring states.

While many states show fluctuations in fluoridation levels, Connecticut’s numbers remain notably stable. This stability is reflected in high coverage rates and tangible impacts on dental health outcomes across diverse communities. Below is a comprehensive overview of key statistics and data points that illustrate Connecticut’s standing in water fluoridation.

Key Statistics Snapshot

Highlighted below are several noteworthy points showcasing the scale and scope of Connecticut’s water fluoridation efforts.

  • Between 86% and 89% of Connecticut residents receive optimally fluoridated water, outperforming the 72.3% national average.
  • Since 1965, Connecticut has mandated water fluoridation in public water systems serving 20,000 or more individuals.
  • Recent statewide data shows a 33.4% lower dental caries rate in fluoridated communities compared to less fluoridated regions.
  • Approximately 2.4 million residents have access to optimally fluoridated water in the most recent reporting year.

These initial figures offer a clear picture of Connecticut’s extensive coverage and the potential link to improved oral health indicators. The sections below provide deeper analysis of each aspect.

Connecticut Water Fluoridation Coverage Over Time

Examining statewide water fluoridation coverage over multiple years provides insight into ongoing trends and changes in the population receiving fluoridated water.

  • From 2004 to 2024, Connecticut’s coverage rate stayed between 86–89%, reaching a high of nearly 89.5% in 2018.
  • The slight dip to 86% in 2024 is attributed in part to population growth in rural areas that lack fluoridation infrastructure.
  • Mandatory fluoridation for public water systems serving ≥20,000 people has helped maintain consistently high coverage rates for urban and suburban populations.
  • Statewide monitoring of monthly average fluoride levels typically targets 0.7 mg/L to balance caries prevention with minimizing fluorosis risk.

Despite small year-to-year variations, these figures show long-term stability. The table below presents select data points illustrating Connecticut’s coverage percentages.

YearFluoridation CoverageApproximate Population Served
200688.0%2.2 million
201188.0%2.3 million
201889.5%2.3 million
202486.0%2.4 million

Dental Health Indicators

Tracking statistics on tooth decay rates, dental fluorosis prevalence, and cost savings offers insights into the broader impact of water fluoridation on public health.

  • Adults ages 40 to 49 show 8.7% mild dental fluorosis prevalence, below the nationwide rate of over 20%.
  • Medicaid claims for restorative procedures are 33.4% lower in heavily fluoridated counties, indicating a correlation with reduced treatment needs.
  • Research estimates an annual $30 per capita savings in dental treatment costs across these fluoridated counties.
  • Children in Connecticut reportedly experience 25% lower untreated dental decay than the national average.

In addition to clinical measures of dental health, economic data underscores the potential budgetary advantages of widespread fluoridation. Below is a table illustrating selected outcomes connected with fluoridation in Connecticut.

IndicatorFluoridated RegionsLess-Fluoridated Regions
Medicaid Restorative Claims33.4% fewerHigher claim volume
Average Annual Per Capita Dental Cost$30 lessBaseline or higher
Mild Fluorosis Rate (Adults 40–49)8.7%20.8% (national)
Untreated Dental Decay (Children)25% below US avg.National baseline

Regional Comparisons

Looking at Connecticut alongside neighboring states reveals considerable variation in fluoridation coverage across the region, highlighting differences in legislation and infrastructure.

  • Massachusetts: Coverage is around 75.6%, driven in part by centralized fluoridation through the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority.
  • New York: Statewide coverage is around 62.9%, with metropolitan areas like NYC at 92% and some rural areas as low as 30%.
  • Rhode Island: 84.2% coverage, nearly on par with Connecticut but enforced through slightly different guidelines.
  • New Jersey: Just 14.5% of the population receives fluoridated water, correlating with a 37% pediatric caries rate compared to 28% in Connecticut.

These cross-state comparisons emphasize the role of state-level regulations and priorities. Below is a table summarizing selected metrics from several Northeastern states.

StateFluoridation CoveragePediatric Caries Rate
Connecticut86–89%~28%
Massachusetts75.6%N/A
New York62.9% (Statewide)N/A
Rhode Island84.2%N/A
New Jersey14.5%~37%

Fluoride Exposure Variations

Although Connecticut’s coverage is notably high, certain parts of the population may have different levels of fluoride exposure based on geography and water sources.

  • About 15% of Connecticut’s public water systems rely on groundwater, some naturally exceeding 0.7 mg/L.
  • Roughly 7% of the state’s residents live in rural counties with decentralized systems lacking consistent fluoridation.
  • Certain Hispanic and Latino communities have 16% higher exposure to fluoridated water due to their reliance on local groundwater sources.
  • Data suggests these communities do not show elevated fluorosis risk, maintaining similar mild fluorosis rates as other demographic groups.

These points illustrate the broader challenge of ensuring uniform fluoridation while balancing naturally high-fluoride water sources with established standards.

Key Statistics Summary

  • 86–89% of Connecticut residents regularly receive optimally fluoridated water.
  • Connecticut’s dental caries rate is 33.4% lower in fluoridated counties.
  • Fluorosis prevalence (mild forms) among adults 40–49 is 8.7%, compared to a national figure of 20.8%.
  • Residents in fluoridated areas save an estimated $30 per person in annual dental costs.

The above data indicates Connecticut has maintained one of the most comprehensive water fluoridation programs in the country. High coverage rates, documented health improvements, and notable cost savings underscore the practical effects of sustained fluoridation efforts. These statistics help illustrate both the current landscape and the value Connecticut’s residents derive from ongoing access to fluoridated water.

Last updated on February 24, 2025
12 Sources Cited
Last updated on February 24, 2025
All NewMouth content is medically reviewed and fact-checked by a licensed dentist or orthodontist to ensure the information is factual, current, and relevant.

We have strict sourcing guidelines and only cite from current scientific research, such as scholarly articles, dentistry textbooks, government agencies, and medical journals. This also includes information provided by the American Dental Association (ADA), the American Association of Orthodontics (AAO), and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).
  1. Community Water Fluoridation and Dentinal Caries. Public Health, Year Unknown.
  2. Community Water Fluoridation by State. America’s Health Rankings, Year Unknown.
  3. Community Water Fluoridation in the United States. American Public Health Association, Year Unknown.
  4. Connecticut Department of Public Health: Oral Health Fluoride. Connecticut Department of Public Health, Year Unknown.
  5. Connecticut General Statute Water Fluoridation Requirements. Connecticut Department of Public Health, Year Unknown.
  6. Connecticut Statewide Fluoridation Plan. Connecticut Department of Public Health, Year Unknown.
  7. Caries Prevalence in Relation to Community Fluoridation. Journal of Dental Research, Year Unknown.
  8. Fluoride Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. National Institutes of Health, Year Unknown.
  9. Fluoridation Impact on Medicaid Expenditures. Health Economics, Year Unknown.
  10. Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Fluoride Information. Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, Year Unknown.
  11. Pediatric Dental Caries Trends. Pediatrics, Year Unknown.
  12. Study on Fluoride Exposure in Hispanic Communities. Environmental Health Perspectives, Year Unknown.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram